<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iterasi&#8217;s PositivePress &#8211; Simple Media Reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ciaoenrico.com/2009/08/25/iterasi-postitivepress-reputation-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ciaoenrico.com/2009/08/25/iterasi-postitivepress-reputation-monitoring/</link>
	<description>Online PR, Search and Social Media (and a ton of complaints)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Melin</title>
		<link>http://ciaoenrico.com/2009/08/25/iterasi-postitivepress-reputation-monitoring/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Melin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ciaoenrico.com/?p=287#comment-176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for mentioning us in the article on PositivePress. Insight engineers are an important way to filter out spam and accurately score relevant sentiment. For &quot;big picture&quot; real-time results, we also have an automated scoring system that finds average sentiment per page and is up to about 90% accuracy compared to humans.

cherrs,
Eric Melin 
@Spiral16]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning us in the article on PositivePress. Insight engineers are an important way to filter out spam and accurately score relevant sentiment. For &#8220;big picture&#8221; real-time results, we also have an automated scoring system that finds average sentiment per page and is up to about 90% accuracy compared to humans.</p>
<p>cherrs,<br />
Eric Melin<br />
@Spiral16</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

