Category Archives: Internet Technology

Microsoft FINALLY relaunches Hotmail

I’ve always been a web mail junkie. It’s a weird thing to be into, but it was the first real “social” tool on the Internet. And when it became something that didn’t need to be tied to my service provider, and therefore my home computer, I was hooked.

Hotmail was one of the first services. (If you can remember seeing, “HoTMaiL” back then, you’re like me – old.) Microsoft eventually bought it, and frankly let it languish. I could never understand that – Yahoo! Mail took over and suddenly everyone had one, and then Gmail introduced a better service, so now it has become the defacto web mail service.

But tonight, without much fanfare, Hotmail has been redone. I don’t know why it took Microsoft so long to get around to it, but good for them for finally fixing it up. If they’re really serious about competing with Google, they need a web mail service that people are going to actually use.

One of the reasons Google is so dominant in search is the mail service. If you’re logged into a site that gives you your mail, you’re home. If you then need to search for something, you’re not going to jump off-site to use something else – you’re going to use whatever is available to there.

In my opinion, that’s one of the big reasons Yahoo! was the big deal in search, and why Google was after that. When Yahoo! was on top, a lot of other sites had e-mail as well. Yahoo! was just doing it better than anyone else. Google hooked people on their results when they were providing results for Yahoo! – but when they gave people a better web mail product, people made iGoogle their home instead of my.yahoo.com.

Hotmail Quick Add share bar

The biggest improvement is that they’ve made it much easier to deal with the most common attachments. There is a search bar to the right that lets you automatically attach photos, videos, movie times, restaurants, maps and business listings. It’s good thinking, frankly – people won’t have to pop open a new window to find content to add to their mails, and it gets people to use their search engine exclusively. Leave it to Microsoft to find a way to get people to use their sub-par product to the exclusion of everything else. (Anyone remember Netscape Navigator?)

They’ve also announced a coming connectivity download to connect Hotmail to Outlook. I find it hard to get excited about that. It feels like Microsoft still feels it’s all about desktop access. If you’ve used the Internet in the last three years, of course, you know it isn’t.

What would have REALLY impressed me is if they built a cloud version of Microsoft Office to open and edit documents that come as attachments. They could easily and almost immediately trounce Google Docs. Sure, there are a lot of people using Docs, me included. But everyone is familiar with Office already. If they created an on line version, it could offer people the tools they’re already familiar with, but include the sharing and online storage Google has.

Perhaps that will come later. I tend to doubt it, since they still make so much money selling Office to people every few years. But if they are serious about getting people to look at Hotmail and Bing as their new “home,” they do need to stop thinking about the desktop and keep building their web presence.

Increase traffic to website – but know what it looks like

Every webmaster tries to increase traffic to their website. Strangely, few understand how to “see” a real increase in traffic. Website analytics packages can tell you if you’ve gotten more traffic this month than last month, but if you don’t know how to find the subtle reasons for a rise or fall, you won’t be able to reproduce what you did right – or avoid what you did wrong.

I’ll give you an example: In my previous life as an advertising agency blogger, a co-worker posted about a popular chain e-mail that was making the rounds. (I’d post a link to it, but prefer not to give them any more link love.) The post included the text of the e-mail. Since a lot of people who’d received the e-mail were interested in finding it afterwards, they searched for selections they’d remembered, and found themselves on our site. The post received about 200 comments in one week, and shot to #1 on Google for a number of key phrases in the post, particularly for the e-mail’s subject line.

So we had a good post. That’s all well and good. But, the increase in website traffic made our month look glorious too. That one post accounted for nearly tripling site traffic for the month it was posted.

The following month, without a similarly viral post to garner that kind of attention, site traffic dropped by nearly 300%.

Now, if I hadn’t been paying attention to the meteoric rise of our traffic because of that post, and was only aware of the monthly numbers, I might assume we were doing all sorts of things right to get more people. Furthermore, the following month would have looked like a disaster, possibly requiring someone’s head.

When you exclude the traffic from that post, however, the two months were largely similar in terms of visits, unique visitors, and actions completed. Sure, you want to have posts that seriously increase traffic to websites, but not every post does that for you.

When you look at the numbers for your site’s performance, you need to drill down into what is responsible for your increases in traffic, and why your website is doing better or worse in a given month. If there’s a change in traffic that you can’t explain, it may well be a shift in the market that you need to address. That, or some of your tech could be broken. Or if the majority of your traffic comes from Facebook, and they again change their site as they’re notorious for doing, this could devastate your traffic.

If you don’t know how to interpret your data, you won’t know why things are happening, and that could be the ruination of you.

Facebook Open Graph is very Friendfeed

I admit it – I don’t trust Facebook. They have a history of playing fast and lose with the privacy of their members, and they have to screw up REALLY badly before they’ll even acknowledge it’s a problem. And when I say bad, I mean Beacon bad.

So when Mark Zuckerberg announced “Open Graph,” this new iteration of Facebook, I reeled. I’d already read that part of Open Graph will be making public my own profile information, whether I want it public or not. The previous ability to selectively block information will be going away, so if you want to keep anything private after Open Graph, your one recourse will be deleting it.

Facebook also announced that Open Graph will pull information from other sites you leave posts and comments on – exactly like Friendfeed. Facebook bought Friendfeed last year, which only seemed fair since they kept stealing ideas from them. I’m guessing the engineers they acquired are now implementing this very Friendfeed-like usability, which is also freaking out privacy minded people across the Internet.

Open Graph bothers me a bit less than the publication of my profile information, I should say. Like Friendfeed, this merely re-publishes things I’ve posted publicly somewhere else. If it works like Friendfeed. There, you plug in the feeds of whatever you want republished – Yelp, Twitter, YouTube, you name it. If you don’t want something appearing there, you simply don’t plug in the feed.

I cannot imagine Facebook is even capable of pulling posts from the Internet on it’s own and applying it to profiles successfully. I do not publish posts using my real name, I use Ciaoenrico everywhere – how will Facebook be able to connect me to these without my telling them Ciaoenrico is me? If I tell them, I am explicitly giving them permission to republish this.

And there have been a lot of Facebook apps that will do this for you individually. Facebook appears to simply be legitimizing republishing social content.

So this aspect of Open Graph doesn’t concern me – and I’m pretty demanding when it comes to my online privacy. The one thing I always did like about Facebook was it’s “Walled Garden” approach, which kept my area all about me and my connections, not outsiders. That’s how it works for me.

I like Friendfeed, on the other hand, for the exact opposite reason: I can read and be contacted by anyone. The difference being I don’t keep any personal information there. If anything, Friendfeed is more like Aquaintancefeed – which is how I like that.

Ultimately, I do not think I will update my Facebook experience by making it even more like Friendfeed than it already was. I have two sites, I get two different experiences from them, and I like them well enough separately.

To tell you the truth, I’d delete my Facebook account a lot faster than I’d ever delete my Friendfeed account.

Need a Podcast Player for Facebook Pages

Okay, I’m done researching, and now I need to turn to begging.

For the last week I’ve been looking for something that, I felt, should be fairly simple to find: A Podcast Player for Facebook pages. Here’s how I saw it:

You port in a feed of your podcast, it pops up on your Fan Page’s feed, complete with player, just as if you were porting over your audio RSS feed into Friendfeed. (It looks like this):

Flash Audio Player for FriendFeed

How simple would that be?

Apparently, not very. I’ve looked at available podcasting apps on Facebook, and none of them will allow you to post to your fan page – only your profile.

Then I tried Yahoo! Pipes to build my own solution. Yahoo! Pipes is a brilliant tool that allows you to take a feed and manipulate, mashup and mix it alone or with several other feeds, then gives you a whole new feed when you’re done. Unfortunately, that was a no-go as well.

So I’m giving up, and throwing down the gauntlet: Does anyone know how to make such a thing work? If you do, let me know and I’ll post all about it. I would do it myself, but I find the world of RSS and feeds has bested me.

Yet another reaction to the iPad

Steve Jobs unveiling the iTouch Macro

It is not technically possible for you to have gotten to this post without having heard from someone that Apple released it’s entry into the tablet market yesterday, the iPad. It’s impossible because news of it is everywhere, and I just don’t have that kind of reach to have gotten to you first. So I won’t bother recapping.

I will say the negative reaction has been weirdly huge. Everything from jokes about the name, (the hashtag “#itampon” was huge on Twitter yesterday,) to complaints about what the thing doesn’t have, (camera, Flash support, the ability to make phone calls,) are making even the most hardcore Apple fanboys cry.

I’m not an Apple guy – I don’t have a problem with their stuff, but I don’t own a Macbook or an iPhone or an iTouch. I’ve had the same iPod for three years now, with no need or hope of replacing it. That having been said, I recognize that Apple is brilliant at defining new markets, and frankly the iPad will do just that.

Everyone has been, for some reason, running to Kindles in the last few years. I don’t get it, because I like reading books on paper myself. But a burgeoning market has opened up, and Apple is now stepping into it. This is just like what they did when they debuted the iPod: MP3 players were everywhere, then Apple came in and redefined the standard. It’s also what they did for smart phones, which were very rare before they came out with the iPhone. They aren’t trying to give you a newer version of something you already have, which frankly really would annoy me. Instead, they’re trying to improve upon what you already have.

The iPad is getting slammed, I think, because most of the people slamming it have no use for what it does. Fine. But that doesn’t mean it sucks, it just means it isn’t meant for you. Not everything is, you crybaby. Given what people say they want to use this for, I think most of them were hoping for a completely touch screen laptop.

The one complaint I do understand is that it will finally cripple AT&T’s data network. AT&T was the single worst possible service provider Apple could have ever tied themselves to. They’d already started asking iPhone users to take it easy with their use of the data service they were actually paying for. Think of that – people were paying for AT&T data service, and AT&T was asking them to not use so much of the data service that their customers were giving them money to use… the bald-faced chutzpah of that always screws me up.

And now Apple has a new wireless device that’s going to need to use the same network. Hey – maybe AT&T are the ones getting everyone to bitch about how the iPad is crap! Because if it does succeed, they may have to finally throw in the towel and admit they don’t know what they’re doing.

Making Sense out of Conversion Tracking with Google Analytics

Here’s the important thing to remember when you’re using Google Analytics, or really any site tracking software: It’s all about who hits what page.

If you don’t already have tracking software on your site, you should. It’s the only way you’re ever going to know who’s coming to you, where they’re coming from, what they’re reading, what they’re buying, and where they’re turning away. Google Analytics is the weapon of choice for most in this. It’s simple to implement – just put the generated tracking code on all of your site’s pages. It’s free, as I said, and it has easily accessible reports.

The issue I run into most when I talk about GA is explaining what it can and cannot do, because it does have limitations.

Goal Conversions

These are conversion points based on people hitting a specific page. If you want to know how many people bought something from your store, then your goal would watch for people hitting your receipt page. Why? Because presumably only customers are going to ever see your receipt page – they can travel all over your site looking at products or blog posts or images, but only the people who click the “order now” button should ever see your receipt page. If you set up your goal to look at this, then you can look at how many of these conversions came from natural search, social media, direct traffic… whatever you need to drill down into.

But what if you have several different kinds of conversions, but they all end up going to the same receipt page?

If your goal is still the receipt page, and the people who hit this are ordering goods, and/or signing up for your e-mail list, and/or downloading a white paper, their numbers will all muck up into each other. This becomes a problem when you want to know how many e-mail sign-ups you get from Facebook in a month.

Funnels

One solution for this is creating a funnel for your goal. Simply, you’ve still got the same goal page people need to hit, (your receipt page in this example,) but the funnel dictates that they must start at a certain page, hit some other pages after that, and eventually come to your goal page.

In this way, if you know that e-mail sign-ups always start on your “e-mail sign-up” page, you can establish this as a necessary first step in your funnel. The report you get will then show you how many people hit your e-mail sign-up page, how many people abandoned it, and how many people continued on to your receipt page – where, presumably, they signed up.

Problems with Funnels

The problem with using a funnel to track your actions is it doesn’t take into account what happened in between the start and the finish of the funnel. If I start out on your e-mail sign-up page, and wound up on your receipt page, how do you know I didn’t instead go to a product page, then buy it WITHOUT signing up for your newsletter? Just viewing the funnel results, it looks like I completed an action.

Ecommerce Tracking

This is an extra bit of code for Google Analytics, specifically designed to not only track conversions, but the specific products purchased and purchase amounts. If you’re trying to prove the ROI of your site, this is what you absolutely need to have in place. Without it, you can’t know how much money you’re getting as a result of your $1000 a month paid search campaign. That $1000 you spend could be earning you $2000 a month, in which case you want to jam your spend up as high as you possibly can. Or that $1000 could be earning you nothing, and you need to stop your campaign immediately.

Obviously, this gives you more information than a goal conversion, which only cares if visitors hit a specific page. With ecommerce tracking, if you only have one receipt page, that’s fine. You have much more granular data about what got them to that receipt page in the first place.

Putting your Google Analytics code onto your site can be done by hand coding, template driver, or server side include. So if you have scads of pages on your site, it’s easily included. This is the added information for including the ecommerce code.

If you use your website as a business, you really can’t afford to not know what your visitors are doing once they find you. With the information you get, a few quick fixes may be all you need to turn your small business into an incredible money maker.

10 Things you’ll be sick to death of by the end of 2010

Everyone writes the introspective, year-in-review blog post around this time of year. As I am someone, that means I have to as well.

But I can’t easily write a, “Top 10 Things about 2009,” because for the most part, 2009 was rotten. Recession, the mortgage crisis, that Twilight sequel… This very blog was born out of my own layoff, since I no longer had my old company’s blogs to spout off on.

So instead, here is my warning of things you will have had just about enough of by the end of 2010.

(By the way, I specifically did not mention Microsoft here, because we’ve all been sick of them since 1998 or so. So if you want to add Windows 7 or Bing, just know that I am with you. I am with you.)

1) Augmented Reality – This is already a buzz word that’s making the rounds, with marketing managers scrambling to find out what it’s all about and iPhone app developers making “squwee!” noises loudly over this new use of GPS tracking and camera.

It’s a nice idea: Mash up your location with various social networking tools, so you can, say, see where geographically all of your Twitter friends are, or view a street with the names of all the shops listed on it. It is pretty neat stuff – but the deluge of articles and videos and seminars teaching you how to “harness this powerful new tool!” is going to hurt after a while. My suggestion: Just make sure your store is listed on Google Maps and all the other social tools you’ve heard about, and leave it alone.

2) Facebook – I’m going out on a limb with this one, but I really think people are going to start to sag with Facebook. It’s great for people to get in touch with people they haven’t seen in a while, but haven’t you noticed that a lot of your long lost friends have been lost for a reason? You don’t have any need to talk to them. Everyone else is a short found friend you talk to every day. That’s what phones and coffee shops are for. After that there are some games, but really, no new or useful information is shared on Facebook.

They’re at a tipping point – a bad one, where people could start falling off at any moment. Add to that their ever-increasing need to monetize their user base, and they’re sure to mess it all up for themselves. As soon as someone introduces the, “next big thing,” Facebook will join MySpace out on the curb.

3) AT&T – Let me say, again, that while I don’t own an iPhone, I do think it’s a pretty rad little device. I have a G1, which I’m sad to say always makes me think of Ziggy from the show “Quantum Leap”: An amazing piece of hardware, but one that gives me so many problems I feel like I constantly need to hit it in order for it to work.

While it is a great phone, stories of AT&T’s idiocy abound. From denying Google Voice’s app to asking users to not use so much data, they’re begging people to switch carriers as soon as the AT&T/Apple contract expires. As much trouble as my G1 gives me, I’m thankful T-Mobile doesn’t give me as many headaches.

4) Information Overload – We’re in this now, but someone’s GOT to make this an issue in 2010. Between my Facebook Wall, Google Reader, Twitter, the blogs I read, the blogs I should read, SlideShare, YouTube… there’s just way too much stuff to stay on top of. I still seem to hear about the latest thing from actually talking to people who are in the know.

It’s actually what keeps me hopeful that FriendFeed will remain afloat for some time, as it’s the best aggregate of everything that still exists.

5) Social Celebrities – I will not name names, but there are far too many people famous in this enormous little circle to take seriously anymore. Some of them have great things to say, most of them are just brilliant at doing their own PR. The result is the interesting people are hard to find because they can’t be heard above the noise. The plus-side of this is it will be good for the publishing industry – because it seems if you really do know what you’re talking about, a publisher will be willing to commit your wisdom to paper.

In short, you aren’t an expert at anything unless you can prove you’ve done something more than get a lot of views on your YouTube channel.

6) Cable Television – Speaking of risky predictions, here’s a great one. Why the hell would cable television be at risk this year? Because the way we get content has changed so dramatically, we aren’t going to be willing to wait for our shows or movies to appear at their scheduled times. Netflix and RedBox are killing Blockbuster with this, as they’ve already killed Hollywood Video. Add to that Apple’s forthcoming subscription service, and you can see that consumers will soon be getting what they want when they want it.

Cable companies themselves see this writing on the wall, and are – smartly – making a good deal of their content available through their on-demand services. I have a feeling the flood of options coming our way will eventually make all cable television on-demand.

7) Web Cams – I know this is just me, but with handheld video cameras now so cheap, and each with a USB slot, there’s no longer any excuse to shoot your 12seconds posts or Vlogs with a web cam. No one hears what you’re saying, because they’re asleep from the visual of another nerd sitting in front of their computer. Unless you have an Internet strip show, you can take it outside.

Let me also say I’m so thankful to my girlfriend for getting me one of these for my birthday, so I can finally openly chastise other people over this. ;)

8 ) Social Media Marketing – I’m already seeing this now, in fact: Agencies abandoning social media as a marketing tool, and going back to traditional venues that have proven their worth before, like SEO and media purchases. This is because social media is supposed to be the voice of the user. You can teach a company how to use the tools, but you can’t out and do it for them quite as easily.

SMM itself isn’t going anywhere, but the idea of hiring someone to do it for you will slowly die. In it’s place, consultants will sell their services training businesses to do it for themselves, and specialty shops will make a fortune building phone apps, games, and anything else that seems like a good idea.

9) Digg – I don’t think I need to do too much of a tap dance on Digg‘s head here. While there is still a huge amount of traffic going to this site, it’s usefulness as a “social” news site is over. Let’s see if they improve after Google buys them up. It’s over, hammer.

10) Paying for Wifi – If you have a hotel or coffee shop that has Wifi, for the love of God, give it to your customers for free. This is something so widely used it can’t be used as a profit center anymore. The occasional hip businessman with a laptop has been replaced by everyone. And everyone now has a smart phone and a netbook. If you just give this away, you’re enticing more people to come to you. You’ll get your money back, I promise.

If McDonald’s says it works, you know there has to be something to it. They’re 70 years old, make $3.9 billion a year, and they suck – so they know the tricks to keeping customers happy.

Bing vs. Google is Getting Interesting

I’ve been saying for a while that I don’t believe Microsoft has the right stuff to challenge Google, but that I would be all for another challenger in the world of search. So if you’ve been paying attention lately, Bing has been doing a lot to compete – and Google is matching them.

Obviously everyone knows about the Bing/Yahoo deal from a few months ago. Both sides were crowing about how they would start integrating Twitter into their search results – though frankly, I don’t know how good an idea that will be. Both may have just killed the site by opening the door to spammers – but we’ll have to just let the three of them work that out.

Then Microsoft announced this week they would start using the Wolfram Alpha Engine. This is a special little tool that finds answers to most any question that has a quantifiable answer. If you need to know what a specific sequence of numbers looks like as a barcode, this will show you. If you want to know the odds of a particular dice roll, they have that too. It’s just the kind of thing a search enginge claiming to be a “decission engine” should have.

Google has always had a wealth of features and purchased sites, (YouTube, Gmail, Google Maps,) so to respond they have to show improvements to what they already have. Movie listings have been expanded, and search listings boast greater child safety. Then of course there was Google Wave, and Google Voice, and just a few hours ago the Google Translator was unveiled. (Which will hopefully work better than the legendary but frequently awkward Babelfish.)

If you’re a capitalist, you know this will lead to many improvements in products from both sides. Google has been trying to transform Gmail into a more “social” platform for some time, and Bing has been getting better and better at image search…

If you worry about SEO, however, this means a LOT more work. (Good news for us professional SEOs!) For the first time in years I’ve been researching how to gain rankings on a Microsoft search engine, just in case. Frankly, they still don’t have Google’s traffic, but that can change very quickly. Facebook kicked the snot out of MySpace in a matter of months. The lesson being those who aren’t able to learn quickly and adapt get left behind quickly.

DocVerse – A quick fix to make Microsoft Google-ish

Just read a sponsored blog post about DocVerse, a new plug-in for Microsoft Office. This would essentially give Word, Excel and PowerPoint the kind of collaborative networking functions that Google Docs has.

This, of course, calls attention to another aspect in which Office is lacking. This plug in is an effort to chase Google’s tail, as they have created a better product, but one that fewer people use.

That’s the rub, of course: Established businesses won’t soon switch to Google Docs for documents and presentations, because they have those Office licenses to pay for. It’s a choice between the better product, and the more universal one.

I’ve worked in an office that used both. When creating documents solo, Office was the choice, just because it was there and had more functionality. (Google keeps improving Docs, though, so this won’t be the case forever.)

On the other hand, when it was a collaborative effort, Google Docs worked seamlessly. I wouldn’t use it as often to create the document I’d share, but I would upload it to Docs to get everyone looking at it and making comments/changes.

So this plug-in is a good idea, but it only addresses one of Office’s problems. The bigger ones are the changes they make to it which confuse everyone upon release. I only just figured out Office 2007, and now they’re going to drop Office 2010 on my head. Then I’ll have to re-learn all those things Excel now does, and no longer does, while still on the clock. (Actually, now that I think of it, this is a plug-in for Office 2007. Does anyone know if collaborative tools will be baked into Office 2010 anyway? Microsoft does have a shady history of stealing ideas from the companies that build software for their platforms.)

I think Google Docs will remain a strong choice for the new, small business, as their suite is less expensive, and does as much and more than Office. Office will stick around until cloud computing makes it unnecessary. And that won’t happen until we get the mythical “Internet 2″ up and running, which can then allow Coca-cola and IBM to dial into Google’s servers without constantly choking.

What DocVerse spells out for me is Microsoft’s inability to keep up with what users want. Meanwhile Google, with their Docs and Wave tools, and their considerably deep pockets, are taking the opportunity to steal M$’ lunch. They already do most everything Microsoft does, just better. Now it’s just a matter of winning over the mind share.