Category Archives: Uncategorized

Why iPod Touches are better than iPhones

If you’re like me, you think that the iPhone is actually pretty neat – but way too expensive for what you get. The reason I never went the iPhone route was because of the cost of the plans, the cost of the handset, and until a couple of years ago, because AT&T was the only carrier I could get one with.

iPod Touch vs iPhone

iPod vs iPhone - would you pay nearly $3000 more just to make phone calls?

iPods turn out to be cheaper. A 32 GB iPhone and iPod retail at the same amount: $299. But the iPhone requires a 2-year contract for it to be $299. The handset without a contract is $799 – and without a phone contract, it’s useless. If you pay $100 a month for an iPhone contract, (which is about average,) your iPhone ends up costing you some $2700.

An iPod Touch, on the other hand, does everything an iPhone does except place calls and SMS messages. It can go online via Wifi, in exactly the same way an iPhone can. Wifi is almost always faster than a cellular data plan anyway, so you’d be doing this even with an iPhone whenever you could get away with it.

What’s more, you get access to the Apple app store just like you do with the iPhone.

Of course, you are going to need to take care of your phone issue separately. Since there are so many contract-free companies with cheap monthly talk plans, this is easily solved. In fact, if you’re more adventurous, you can get an inexpensive smart phone plan, jailbreak your iPod Touch, and tether the two together. Then you wouldn’t even need Wifi hotspots to take your iPod online – you’d just need your other phone to be nearby.

I do not understand why anyone pays so much for a phone just to play games or watch movies. It is an insane waste of money to pay so much for what is ostensibly a toy. But if you want to get on board with all of the development being done for the iPhone, this is a much cheaper option.

Stop buying electronics

The CES is this week – the toy fair for middle-aged men-children who want to find out what to ask Santa for next Christmas. Now, I’m not the kind to tell people they need to stop buying electronic baubles because of the sweat shops they come from. I also won’t bust on people for spending beyond their means during a recession. I don’t really think I should have to.

No, the reason for the title of this post is simple: By buying more phones, tablets, computers and accessories, you are sending a signal to manufacturers that they don’t need to make anything better in order to get your money.

Think about it: Every year, manufacturers come out with products that are largely the same as the ones they released last year. They push a version of Android that’s supposed to be slightly better than the one they sold you last year, or an iPhone that doesn’t have a broken antenna. And exactly how many versions of the Nintendo Gameboy need to be made until they decide they’ve gotten it right?

If you keep buying something new each year, you send a signal to manufacturers that they just need to put out something – anything – to get you to buy it.

If your phone is good enough, just keep it. Stop replacing the stuff you have if it isn’t broken. If enough people finally let manufacturers know they need to innovate something that is actually new before you give them their money, they won’t keep releasing products that don’t entirely work, need patches, or are just useless collections of molded plastic.

Conversations about the Death of Steve Jobs

These are some of the things I’ve been hearing from people for the last 16 or so hours since Steve Jobs died.

I’ll keep adding to this as I continue to get more interesting (read as: weird) takes on the death of some guy I’ve never met:

“I wonder how long it will take until they discover he actually died last week, and they kept him in a freezer until AFTER the Apple Product Announcement? I mean, what are the chances of that?” – My Girlfriend

“I called in yesterday, and [co-worker] told me, ‘Steve is dead!’ And I thought, like, who’s Steve?” – Co-worker

“See, I think they found a way to graft his mind into the iOS system – so that when the next update comes out, Steve Jobs will be in every device, and will then be able to take over the world from beyond the grave!” – Okay, that one’s me.

“Apple will do fine, until they unveil iRadio or iStapler in a couple of years.” – Someone on G+

“What about Apple putting a Samsung Galaxy S2 into an iPhone case then calling it ’4S?’” Person on G+ responding to that last person on G+

“The reason the new phone is ’4S’ is so they can then say it’s the new iPhone – ‘for Steve.’ I don’t know if it is masterful, or skeevy.” – IT Guy

“It’s not that some famous person died. It’s that someone hugely successful died at only 56 that bums people out. Because if that’s possible for him, it means none of us are safe. We can each get our clock punched at any time.” – Me again.

“Yeah, but pancreatic cancer is a big deal. You don’t get to string your life along like that UNLESS you have Steve Jobs money in the bank.” – Co-worker

“Whatever you do, keep your mouth shut. You always end up saying something really crass when people die. The way Apple fanboys are, you’ll probably get lynched.” – My Girlfriend, before I left the house this morning

Why Social Media is bad for Blogging

Don’t get me wrong – social media is great for promoting blog posts. And given how many posts are written about social media these days, there wouldn’t be much to write about without Facebook and Twitter and G+ and everyone’s ideas of what constitutes “important” with all these sites.

The problem is with there being so many ways to share something simply, a blogger can loose steam. If every interesting thought you have is pushed out in less than 140 characters, you aren’t going to put in the work to spell it out in a full post.

The same is true of personal blogs. Why write out 300 words of why your day is going great if you can just make a quick quip, and attach a funny picture you found?

As I see it, part of the problem is everyone feels a responsibility to be entertaining. It’s high school all over again, where we want to be popular by posting the kind of things that get reshared and retweeted and get us more followers.

I’ve definitely fallen into this trap – especially now that Google Plus is on the scene. That is the point of social media, of course. It isn’t for broadcasting long ideas, but socializing. If you’re using all of your best ideas just socializing, though, you don’t have anything left to blog about.

So if you’re trying to blog, cut down on the fun time with friends and research a topic, or share an opinion with explanations of why you’re right.

That’s what I’m going to start doing anyway.

You Can’t Block Facebook Questions

In case you were hoping for a way to block Facebook Questions from your account, you can’t – thanks to the typical enthusiasm for the ideas they’ve chosen to steal all by themselves, Facebook won’t allow you out.

block facebook questions

Facebook Questions

Facebook Questions, if you haven’t already used it, is a simple way of polling your friends. It’s a good idea actually, one that several thrid-party developers had already created, and millions of others had been using.

The problem was, as is the case with most third-party Facebook apps, you had to give it permissions to access your profile. Many people weren’t comfortable with this. So when Facebook created its own feature, it effectively killed using any of these third-party solutions.

The one real benefit of a polling app not made by Facebook is that you can block it if you want to. If you’d rather not receive them on your Facebook Wall, or have them sent to you, you are out of luck. Facebook considers Questions as integral to their experience as Photos or Events.

The big difference being I can prevent individual friends from sending me Events. They can be blocked easily enough in my privacy settings. Not so with Questions. The only solution for keeping someone from sending you a Question is to unfollow them.

One thing you can do keep these notifications from being e-mailed to you:

  1. Go to your Account Settings.
  2. Click on the “Notifications” tab.
  3. About halfway down the page, you’ll see the notification settings for Questions. Start unchecking boxes!

Schema.org – A new, bright way of informing search engines

Exciting news this week for SEO junkies: Google, Bing and Yahoo are all backing a new standard for web page meta data, schema.org. More than simply adding keywords into the existing title, meta keywords and meta description, this new markup gives the tags you used a context that helps search engines find results.

For example, if you wanted to rank for “golf bags in Arizona,” you might include that phrase in the meta keywords, the page title, and in a sentence or two in the description.

With this, however, you can include information that helps search engines understand why ranking your page for “golf bags in Arizona” makes sense.

Also, the placement of these tags inform the search engines where this relevant information can be found.

<div itemscope itemtype =”http://schema.org/LocalBusiness”>

This tag informs the search spider what kind of tab is being employed. Schema.org has several different definitions you can use, depending on the information you’re trying to call out.

Then you add similarly focused tags to call out the information that shows this as a “local business,” which you told them was coming in the line above:

<h1 itemprop=”name”>Sam’s Golf Shop</h1><span> itemprop=”streetAddress”>1212 W. Dobson</span>
<span itemprop=”addressLocality”>Tempe</span>
<span itemprop=”addressRegion”>AZ</span>
<span itemprop=”postalCode”>85284</span>
</div>

In a way, this is a step back for search engines. For years they have endeavored to create algorithms that could read the page, and make decisions themselves about what a page was, and what it meant. Since these programs cannot actually read and understand a page yet, they call on the webmaster to include context that makes the tags make sense.

Because of that, I have no doubt these tags can and will be abused by smart-yet-nefarious SEOs.

However, this now also gives all of the good SEOs a way to qualify those tags. That way, we can both start getting better search results.

Why you aren’t as big on YouTube as Sony Ericsson

If you’re a marketing manager for a huge corporation that has no views on its YouTube page at all, you may be wondering, “Hey – how can I get some of that YouTube magic to rub off on me?”

Below are four video commercials on YouTube for the Sony Ericsson Xperia phone, starring Kristen Schaal.

These commercials are funny, short, and frankly anyone with talent could have made them (if only talent were easy to come by) because there’s not much production to them.

Now, it’s very likely your corporate communications strategy won’t let you do things like this in anything, much less a video available on YouTube.

That’s why you CANNOT get some of that YouTube magic to rub off on you: Because your corporate blah-blah-bladity-blah is dedicated to bland content. The company line is that you love being completely boring so much you want to marry it and have its goddamn babies.

You don’t suck by some freak of nature – you suck on purpose. And no amount of professionally produced advertising is going to change that.

If you want to be noticed on YouTube, you are going to have to up your game at least as much as what appears above.

I’m just sayin’.

I won’t go to SXSW

Today SXSW starts – it’s the tech world’s Lollapalooza. The tech world’s Woodstock. The tech world’s US Festival.

And to be honest, I don’t really care. I hate SXSW.

If you are going, I hope you have fun – I am not trying to hate on you. It’s the idea of the get-together itself that I object to, and I have to say why. (After all, I need a post, and this is the biggest tech news this moment.)

I know I’m supposed to, because everyone else does. The fact of the matter is nothing important ever really comes out of SXSW. The announcements that happen there would happen anyway. Without SXSW, Facebook or Google or anyone could announce something new just fine.

See you at SXSW, Broo! Now where the heck are my dungus clothes?

See you at SXSW, Broo! Now where the heck are my dungus clothes?

In fact, conference are basically useless since most of the attendees will fill their own blogs with recaps of what they heard. In some cases, people UStream the panel itself with their phones, just so they can say they did. If anything is said of real import, it will be in an article on CNET.com. If anything is said that’s particularly inflammatory or interesting, it will be uploaded to YouTube.

And if anyone really valued the experience of “being there” for these things over reading them on a blog or watching them on YouTube, they wouldn’t be geeks worthy of a SXSW. How’s that for irony!

The real reason for SXSW is for the tech geek elite to get together and schmooze. It’s a chance for marketers to assault the tech geek crowd, and for tech geeks to party – both concepts being mildly revolting.

Sometimes these two things come together, like when a “celebrity” geek publishes a book, (those things on paper that are outdated by the time they reach store shelves, so they never sell – surely you’ve heard of them, right?) they’ll have a “party” celebrating their accomplishment, in the hopes people will talk about the author, and by extension the book – even if only to explain why there was a party.

The value of schmoozing has always been lost on me, frankly. In my day-to-day life, I’d pay real money just to not have to talk to anyone. I don’t see the value, though, of paying to go to Texas and say I got to hang out with… hey, who is this year’s tech celebrity, anyway? Ah, who cares.

Charlie Sheen – Public Relations Genius

If you think Charlie Sheen is a maniac who can’t keep his mouth shut, you’re probably right.

But he may be the first person in history to make that work for him.

We’ve always had celebrities go crazy for our entertainment, of course – Britney Spears, Mel Gibson, Margot Kidder, Anne Hache – but each time one of those people flipped out the story was spun so we could understand that they were either under “incredible strain,” or that they were receiving help. They disappear for a while, then return months later with a comeback of some kind.  (Mel Gibson being the exception, as he seems to think it’s so much fun he does it over and over agian.)

Charlie Sheen, however, seems to be the first A-list celebrity to take his scandal by the horns and say, “Yes, this is me – if you don’t like it, too  bad.” Say what you want, but it is incredibly brave. Rather than try to appease a public fast to condemn him, he makes no apologies for himself.

It’s also incredibly smart. With the number of PR responses to so many other scandals like this, the public is jaded. If he had taken the advice of his former publicist and announced he was going into treatment, laid low, then did a mea culpa on The Oprah Winfrey Show, I doubt anyone would have noticed or cared.

It would have blown over, but he would have kept the stigma of it. Do you really think Britney Spears isn’t still batshit crazy? Do you think Mel Gibson doesn’t still hold resentments against Jews?

The result so far of Mr. Sheen’s strategy is astonishing. His various interviews of rambling, bizarre quotes. He admits to drug use, though he isn’t using now. (He took two drug tests to prove this and passed them both, though the tests used could only go back 72 hours. Make of them what you will.)

He has gone on Twitter, and reached 1,000,000 follwers faster than anyone in the history of the site. His hashtags – #tigerblood, @planbetter, and the enigmatic #winning, have been trending topics since he started. It’s safe to say he owns Twitter now.

Rather than just let things fade from people’s consciousness, he’s ridden the tide. The brilliance of this is he now controls the message about him. Even if that message is, “wow, what a nut.”

There is no Digital Copy in the DVD/Blu-ray combo pack

By now you’ve likely seen the commercials for “DVD/Blu-Ray/Digital Copy” combo packs for movies. It almost sounds like the people making it finally understand, that the digital version is as important as the physical one.

Don’t be fooled – the digital copy is still just an extra to them, doesn’t work every time, and doesn’t come on a data disc for you to store. You’re still better off just getting it from iTunes, or finding a decent DVD ripping tool to make a copy of your own.

Not that anyone in their right mind would ever buy a copy of "Old Dogs," but if you did there is NO disk with a Digital Copy.

When Inception was released last week, I jumped at the chance to have three separate copies of it. DVD for now, the Blu-Ray for when I am eventually forced to get a player, and the Digital Copy for my laptop, or PSP, or iPod, or whatever I happen to have on me when I travel.

These commercials insinuate that the Digital Copy comes on a disc of it’s own, but this isn’t the case. You get a code and a website. When you go to the website, you must download their downloading program, insert the code, and let it download to your machine.

When I tried this though, the results were mixed, to put it kindly. The iTunes version (.mov) would not load. Okay, on to Windows. (AVI.) The large version failed to download. I tried the portable version, which worked, but then the code stopped working – so I couldn’t get the larger, more crisp version of the file.

So why don’t they simply have a digital copy on a data disc, like their commercials suggest? Because this is the film industry’s own version of DRM (digital rights management) for their films. They know people aren’t just watching movies on their TVs anymore, but they’re scared to death of consumers sharing around their homemade digital copies of films. This solution with codes and websites means people have the opportunity to do this, but without a physical disc they can pass around.

The problem with that is I paid for the movie – so I should be allowed to do with it what I want.

The film industry sees things a bit differently. They believe they ALWAYS own the content – we just buy the little plastic disc on which to watch it.

This is why there are so many hurdles to jump in order to get a Digital Copy to work. I’ve been working with media files for years, so I have a bit of a leg up trying to get this stuff to work. The average consumer doesn’t, and would likely have given up early in the chase for a copy to play on their iPhone.

If you want a personal, travel-able copy, don’t bother with these combo packs. They still think of the Digital Copy as an afterthought, not something that needs to work spot-on every time.

Epilogue: In the end, I did not make my own digital copy of Inception. I did not use a program called DVD Decrytor to get the files off the disc, and I most certainly did not use another program called HandBrake (handbrake.com) to recompile these files into a video file I can play on any machine I feel like. I didn’t because it is illegal to do this with something I bought and own. So I didn’t.

Really.